Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Justice Junction's New Board -> Justice Junction's New Board -> OJ Simpson, an alternative theory
Post Info TOPIC: OJ Simpson, an alternative theory
Mwat935139


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
OJ Simpson, an alternative theory
Permalink  

OJ was there on the night of the murders.  He was there when his eldest son Jason called him and advised that hed just killed Nicole and another man.   OJ not believing if his son had really done  this or just imagined hed done it raced over to Nicoles residence where he found Jasons statements to be horrifically true.  A fight between Jason and OJ at the scene of the crime left OJ with a cut on his finger.

You must understand, Jason Lamar Simpson is unbalanced, he has an extensive history of violence with his weapon of choice, knives.  He had at least 3 documented instances of violence with  a knife.  Prior to the killings, Jason was on probation for assaulting a co working at his place of business with a knife.  He had attempted suicide before with a knife.  He had been arrested and hospitalized in a Neuropsychiatric institute on at least two occasions, he was diagnosed with explosive rage disorder and being treated with medication, depakote. 

 

In his deposition prior to OJ's civil trial, Jason lied about the time he left work that evening, he also admitted he had in possession his knives used for his occupation. (please read deposition) http://walraven.org/simpson/js_depo1.html

 

Jason has always lived in the shadow of his famous father.  OJ had actually gotten Jason into USC in the late 1980's and he was on the football team with his fathers influence.  One problem though, Jason couldn't play. Humiliated, he quit and left school.

 

Later, Jason became competent chef and was working at Jackson's Restaurant in the capacity of sous chef.  He had finally found his role in life and was extremely  proud at his accomplishment.

 

Weeks prior to the killing, Jason had spoken with Nicole about having a dinner at his restaurant after his half sister Sidney's dance recital.  Nicole agreed and informed her family of the arrangements.  Jason bought special food and was very excited about the prospect of finally being able to show what he could do, he would finally receive recognition for having accomplished something in his life. 

 

Jason received a call from Nicole on the day of the recital and she cancelled on him without providing him a good enough explanation, this was the trigger which ignited his rage against her.  It was planned, he went there prepared to kill, in his sick mind her cancelling the dinner was justifiable in his mind to take her life, and he did just that.  Ron Goldman happened upon the scene during the time of the attack which further fueled his rage thinking that Nicole had cancelled the dinner in order to have a liason with this man.  Ron didn't stand a chance.

 

Remember the unidentified footprints identified by DR Henry Lee?  They're Jason's.  Remember the mixture blood that was similar to OJ's but wasn't proven to be 100% OJ's, it's Jason's.

 

Ask yourself this question, who is the only person in the world you'd risk your liberty, wealth and fame, and actually die for?  Your child.

OJ rolled the dice and won the criminal trial.  He knew he would be targeted from the beginning because of what had happened in 1989 with the domestic violence plea of no contest.  He has directed all inference away from his son and upon himself for his life is already destroyed, and yes, he proved to his son that really did love him which was one of Jason's main problems, he never believed his father loved him. 

 

Please view closely the reading of the verdicts in the OJ Simpson trial.  As the camera pans away from the Goldman's focus on Jason Simpson sitting next to his sister with his head in his hands crying out of control. What do you really see.  Looks like complete guilt to me, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg7OTs7cif4   What do you see?

 

The Los Angeles police department did just what Johnny Cochran said they did, a rush to judgment. 

 

One last note.  It was proved during the OJ Simpson trial that EDTA a blood preservative was found on blood taken from the crime scene and on the socks found in OJ's residence.  This was planted evidence from the blood that Van Hatter carried with him.  Once this was proved, the case was effectively over and the jury reached the correct verdict.  Once it's been proven that the police tampered with evidence, the case is over.....case closed.

 

 



__________________
mrw
annarocket


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2246
Date:
Permalink  

I was wondering if someone was going to step up to bat on this OJ thing.For all that it's been over for so long,I still get hate mail,"alternative" theories and hypothetical scenerieos.

First I commend you for actually speaking your mind and not just sending another email.Salud!

However,I can't say I go along with much of your alternative theory,it has far too many flaws. Jason Simpson may have longed for his father's respect and approval and tried to gain it by going to USC and playing ball.But your idea that he was on Depakote for a mood altering disorder is wrong.If you read the link you posted in your post,Jason says he is on Depakote for epilepsy,It's used to treat neurological disorders. Jason Simpson was not a large man and it would have been difficult for him to have committed this act alone and then call OJ after the fact.It just isn't physically possible.

In that same LONG link he gives no clue that Nicole and her family had agreed to dine at the resteraunt he worked at after Sydney's dance recital the night of the murders. There has been considerable evidence to the contrary,they had dining plans that had made well in advance and had nothing to do with Jason Simpson.

The YouTube video shows a young man clearly relieved his beloved father isn't going to jail. Since Jason was never a suspect,it's hard to fathom he was awash with relief the clanging of the prison doors were not going to be behind him.

The detective you referred to is named Vannatter.....not "Van hatter".The correct person isn't in jail for the murder of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman and as long as people have half baked ideas about what they think happened,the lie that OJ Simpson is innocent will perpetuate.

I'd like to take this oppertunity to address an issue that has been going on for a while here.People have been emailing me about the crime scene photos connected to this case. This piece was written and the pictures were posted before I was an Administrator here.I have complete confidence in Jill,as my Editor,and her decisions made before I came on board stand up without my participation.Had I been involved at the time,I don't know if I would have done any different.The reason those pictures are there are so everyone will understand the sheer brutality of the crimes OJ Simpson committed,and walked away a free man from. I admire Jill's bravery for showing the world what I could not and asking you to remember that is why the photos are there.
Thank you,
Annarocket

-- Edited by annarocket on Friday 7th of May 2010 09:09:30 PM

__________________

....come death, and welcome! Juliet wills it so!
Mwat935139


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink  

I appreciate your response Anna, you certainly are entitled to your opinion as I'm entitled to mine.   Please excuse the incorrect spelling of Vannatter, I will correct the spelling on my post if able.

I have personal knowledge of some of the facts of this issue in regards to Jason's past history, medical and otherwise which I also know are mischaracterized in his deposition.  Epilepsy, not a chance.  Depakote is routinely prescribed as a calming agent for patients with explosive rage disorder.  

It is my belief that one day Jason will confess to the truth of that night, it's also my belief that OJ Simpson is a prime candidate for the mental poverty program based on his actions after his acquittal.

Please keep an open mind, and don't be surprised on some sunny day that the truth is revealed....

Thank you for your response,

Mwat935139

__________________
mrw
annarocket


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2246
Date:
Permalink  

I welcome any intelligent conversation and this is definately in that category.

As far as Jason being epileptic,I don't know.If he mischarecterized himself for whatever reason,I don't know about that. I know he had a particularly hard time at Nicole's funeral.It made me wonder if there wasn't something I was missing.

You say OJ is going to be aquitted? Do you mean in the Las Vegas case he's serving time for or the civil suit the Goldman family won against him? What mental poverty program are you talking about? I've honestly not heard of such.

In one thing we're in agreement:I always am looking for some sunny day....sun.gif

__________________

....come death, and welcome! Juliet wills it so!
420ville


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 65
Date:
Permalink  

I agree w/ Anna! Yet Depakote is used for BOTH.

I must say, when reading this post, I was a little more curious..After viewing the video, I don't see what your speaking of.

However, it would have made one heck of a good movie.


__________________

388717011562252599
Mwat935139


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink  

Hi Anna,

Just for clarification, I meant that after his acquittal in the first criminal trial, OJ should have kept his mouth shut, dropped out of sight and tried to live as normal a life as one possibly in obscurity.  I was extremely  angry when he attempted to have his book published, "If I Did It."  That's what I meant by mental poverty program.

Second, Jason Simpson is 6'0  225 lbs.  I think this would render him more than physically capable of dominating his victims, especially in a small confined area where the murders took place. 

I do believe that in the second criminal trial in Las Vegas that OJ was convicted and sentenced based on what happened in Los Angeles in 1995.  It is also my belief that if not freed by the Supreme Court of Nevada, his case will be overturned by the United States Supreme Court.  

Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of OJ Simpson, I just think an injustice was done when a first time convicted felon receives a sentence like that based on the circustances of the case.  You or I would have received probation or max 2-4 years.

__________________
mrw
Mwat935139


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink  

Hi 420vile,

Thanks for your reply.

When viewing the video, keep in mind of what you just read in my post.  This man looks totally overwhelmed that the father he thought never loved him actually sacraficed all that he had to protect him by running the gauntlet of the  legal system.

That's what I see.


__________________
mrw
Navywife


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 580
Date:
Permalink  

I looked at everything and I just don't see it. This is a very simple case that got all twisted around, I believe, because of OJ's celebrity status. A jealous and mentally disturbed man obsessed with his ex wife murdered her and someone who he viewed as his competition. Happens all the time.

His son has zero motive to kill Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman. Jason obviously cared about his half siblings, so I highly doubt he would do something as traumatizing to them as murdering their mother.

However, it's possible Jason may or may not know more about the murders than he's ever told. Maybe OJ told him what he was going to do, or maybe he confessed to Jason what he had done, maybe Jason even helped him clean up afterwards, who knows. But Jason is not the murderer who brutally took the lives of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman.

__________________
Mwat935139


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink  

Thank you for your reply NAVYWIFE. I respect your opinion and value your input.

I suggest to you that Jason did have a motive. The motive was that Nicole cancelled the planned dinnner in which Jason had planned extensively for. Doesn't sound like a reason to do a double murder for the average human mind, but to a sick mind who has been diagnosed with explosive rage disorder it was more than enough.

At the beginning of the trial, I though OJ Simpson was guilty as hell. One nagging question kept lingering in my mind.......Why would he do this and think he could get away with it? Especially since it was already public knowledge that he had abused Nicole. It didn't make sence to me at all.

I asked myself the question, who would you protect and risk your own life for in order to save their life. The only answer I came up with is your child.

Researching Jason wasn't hard to do. I was totally taken back as I learned more about this man, he's a frightening individual. I developed this theory in 1996 and was quite surprised that during my research that I'm not the only one that shares this same point of view.

It's a known fact that OJ Simpson was aware of the many liasons Nicole was having, even with his one time best friend Marcus Allen the former running back for the Los Angeles Raiders. Did he attack her then? Did he attack Marcus? Did he attack Keith Zalomnovich when he stopped by her home to visit his kids and observed her through the window perforiming a sex act on him? No. These are documented facts. Why didn't he attack then if he were so obsessed? Answer, because he wasn't.

It is of my opinion that Jason did this and OJ is guilty of covering it up.

__________________
mrw
annarocket


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2246
Date:
Permalink  

Ah,the infamous,"If I Did it". Who on the face of God's green earth would be found 'not guilty' of the murder of his ex-wife and a friend of hers....and then write a book speculating if he did,how it happened.

The American public is NOT that stupid and I suspect a lot of others agree.

Jason Simpson doesn't look that size.Maybe I need a new monitor,lol. But there has never been any talk that the dinner after Sydney's recital was his reason for killing Nicole.I do not believe he would do that knowing the children he called brother and sister slept above them.

I agree with Navywife [we don't practice this,it just happens LOL] that if Jason knows anything about the murders,if OJ told him something,think about it....how afraid would he been of OJ? He would have protected to the death the hero he worshipped,his father.       evileye

__________________

....come death, and welcome! Juliet wills it so!
Navywife


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 580
Date:
Permalink  

Mwat, OJ did this and thought he could get away with it for the very same reason other celebs break laws and think they can get away with it. Because of their celeb status, money, and power.

And OJ was obsessed with Nicole. It's proven and documented that he stalked her on numerous occasions, beat her, etc.

As flawed as this investigation was, they still turned over every rock they could find. Nothing was found linking Jason to the murders at all. A mountain of evidence (some of it planted, but most of it not), was found against OJ.

I believe it was sometime after Nicole Brown was murdered (not sure how long after) the actor Robert Blake, murdered his wife, and he got away with it as well.

Believe me, it's VERY possible to get away with murder, literally, in Hollywood. Money and power go a loooooong way.

Another point for you to consider, if Jason really did do this as you suspect, wouldn't he confess? As much as he loved his father like you claim he did, would he really let his dad take the fall for him in civil court, as well as in the court of public opinion?



__________________
Navywife


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 580
Date:
Permalink  

I will say this about the murder though. I think others were involved along with OJ. Maybe not with the actual killings, but with the covering up. I don't think OJ is the lone culprit in this. But I just don't see Jason as the murderer.

__________________
Jillybean


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 129
Date:
Permalink  

Mwat,
I just finished reading all the posts in this thread and I'm not even sure where to start. Well, I guess to start I should tell you that I wrote the original series of articles regarding the OJ case and to be completly truthful, I honestly thought (and still believe) that OJ murdered his ex-wife. I took as many domestic violence classes as I could throughout my quest for my Masters Degree in Criminal Justice and have personal first hand knowledge of severe domestic abuse. That said, I can spot the signs of DV a mile away. I can't tell you how many cases I studied in classes that revolved around a jealous X murdering his spouse or ex-girlfriend. OJ was compulsivly obssessed with Nicole, he was a very dominate, controlling male who couldn't stand to see his "property" not under his control. His abusive actions with girlfriends after the murder directly substantiate his abusive and controlling nature - to be honest, I'm suprised he never abused his daughter. Abusers rarely stop at their spouses, it almost always spills over to the children on some level, but the one thing I can say is that it always appeared as though he loved his children deeply.

I am though going to look a little deeper into what you've stated here. When I first started writing this series, I did honestly make a very good effort to look at other suspects. I wanted to present the evidence and allow the readers to make up their own minds. I didn't want to influence their decision (though I'm not sure that I achieved that specific goal!) And to be brutally honest, one of the first people that I looked at was his oldest son and for a couple of different reasons. Maybe he hated her because he felt that Nicole had taken his father away from his mother, maybe he was jealous of her, maybe he wanted his dad to spend more time with him and not with her and so on and so forth. I couldn't find anything substantial enough to make me doubt that OJ commited the murders. Though I do agree with you that the only person he would ever cover up for (if indeed he was covering up for someone) would be someone that he loved dearly (a child, other relative of best friend) and I did honestly look at those angles when writing the originals pieces.

Also, I noticed in your post that you mentioned that OJ's son had (was it) explosive anger issues? When my second daughter was 15 we started having problems with her that just came out of nowhere and had no clue where they came from. We took her to dr's, to shrinks, to everyone we could think of and finally she was diagnosed with expolsive anger but never would she have killed someone - she was just plain out pissed off and didn't know how to handle her anger according to societies standards.

I stand by the articles that I wrote and I honestly believe that OJ cold bloodely murdered Nicole Brown Simpson but I am always willing to look at a new angle.

Jillybean

-- Edited by Jillybean on Thursday 13th of May 2010 09:45:37 PM

__________________
Administrator

Trust is an amazing thing ......
annarocket


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2246
Date:
Permalink  

Navywife wrote:

I will say this about the murder though. I think others were involved along with OJ. Maybe not with the actual killings, but with the covering up. I don't think OJ is the lone culprit in this. But I just don't see Jason as the murderer.


No,OJ didn't do this alone,but I believe it was either Jason or AC Cowlings helping him cover up the crime.

Am I the only one here who read "If I did it"? Yeah,OJ recanted big time but I'm not buying it. When they went to preview this,Judith Regan was fired and Rupert Murdoch had to back down because the American public was so disgusted.

A movie about this,oh my God.The thought alone is unreal.I can't imagine who could direct it.Actually,I can but hell if I'm saying.I don't feel like being villified today.       evileye

 



__________________

....come death, and welcome! Juliet wills it so!
Mwat935139


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink  

Thank you Jillybean for your response.  

I respect your view on the Simpson matter and always look forward to hearing from people that share the same passion of trying to understand why events such as these occur.

Explosive rage disorder is born from a chemical imbalance in the brain which effects the central nervous system and thought processes.  The point being, if left untreated or if a patient stops taken his/her medication, any perceived threat to the individual can culminate in acts of rage.  I have no evidence that Jason went off his depakote immediately preceeding the murders, but I certainly suspect it.

At some point, I do believe that my theory of the events on June 12, 1994 will be made known.  As I stated before, I'm no OJ fan, and I certainly hate what he did after his acquittal by writting that book If I Did It.  That was totally inappropriate and down right disrepectful to his ex wifes memory and to Ron's. 

I value your opinion and look forward to your views on this or any other subject...

Thank you,

Mwat935139

__________________
mrw
Navywife


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 580
Date:
Permalink  

Anna, I never read the book. I thought about it, but, at the time, was afraid that somehow, OJ was going to make money off of this book, and I sure as hell wasn't going to give a cent to him.

Then, life got in the way. Other big crime stories made the news, and the murders and then the book just kind of faded away for me.

I do hope for the families of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman that they do find justice.

__________________
Mwat935139


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink  

Hi Navywife,

I agree that we disagree.  Jason did have a motive.  As stated before, he's not normal.  When the dinner was cancelled by Nicole, this was the trigger that set him off.  You must remember, you're a normal person with no chemical imbalance.  People with explosive rage disorder are unpredictable, any event that they perceive as a threat or disappointment in their lives can cause a violent reaction towards the perceived perpatrator. 

I have never been the type of person to accept without question what's presented in the media until i'm proved wrong.  Changing gears, I never thought that JFK was killed by a lone gunman nor was Bobby Killed by Sirhan.  When things just don't add up, I question them until i'm proven wrong. 

You make a good point, why would Jason kill Nicole and leave her body in a place where the kids could have easily have come downstairs for a glass of water looking for their mom and find her mutilated body outside her front door.  Great point.

On the other hand, Why would their father leave them in the same situation?  This only strengthens my position, I don't think a father that loves his children could ever do this,but I think a mentally disturbed person could.

__________________
mrw
Mwat935139


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink  

Anna,

Jason didn't worship his father.  He actually disliked him and throughout his youth they were constantly at odds with one another.  Jason became  so problematic that OJ sent him away to boarding school which exacerbated the ill feelings he felt for his father.  Remember, his dad left his mother for Nicole.  He harbored these feeling of abandoment for years.  

Can you imagine growing up the son of one of the most celebrated atheletes in the country and he's actually an absentee dad.  Everyone expecting you to thrive in the footsteps of your famous father.  He wanted his dads love, and his father was too intent on builing his career to provide the necessary guidance for his not so stable son.  He was a time bomb waiting to explode! 

That's my point Anna, in the end, OJ did show Jason that he loved him, he rolled the dice and faced the legal system in order to protect his son.  

Right after OJ was acquitted that day in 1995, Jason, at a press conference read a statement from his father.  I will attempt to locate the footage and post it.  He begins by saying, " I would like to read a statement from my father."  He sighs then says, "Yes, from my father."  Doesn't sound like much, but I believe at that point Jason realized that he actually had a father.

Food for thought,

Take care

mwat935139

__________________
mrw
Navywife


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 580
Date:
Permalink  

There are hundreds of document cases where fathers (and mothers as well, but I'm talking about fathers here since OJ is a father) have kidnapped and even murdered their children, or murdered their mother. And it wasn't because they didn't love their kids. It was because they were blinded by hate towards the mother. Yes, they were also mentally disturbed, obviously. But in their minds, they loved their kids. But they also hated the mother of their kids, and were so blinded by the hate, they were determined to keep the mother away from her kids, by whatever means necessary.

OJ was obsessed with Nicole, he loved her, but, he also hated her. He hated her for leaving him, for moving on, for not taking him back. So he murdered her. Because if he couldn't have her back as his wife, she wasn't going to be anyone else's wife either.

Jason had no reason to be jealous of Nicole. How could he feel replaced by Nicole or jealous of her? Kids feel replaced, or jealous of another child, or a stepparent, when they've been the center of their parents universe, and then a new person comes along and suddenly they aren't the center anymore. Jason was never the center of OJ's universe. So why would he feel replaced?

__________________
Navywife


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 580
Date:
Permalink  

Mwat, are you saying that OJ isn't mentally disturbed? Your statement that "A father wouldn't leave his children in that situation, but a mentally disturbed person would" leads me to believe you think Jason is mentally disturbed, but his father is not.

There is something you're overlooking. Besides the obvious signs of mental illness that OJ displayed over the years (domestic violence, stalking, being a pathological liar), he also shows a HISTORY of violence. His girlfriend after Nicole suffered a serious brain injury. Numerous stories were thrown out to explain her injury (she was at a gas station, drunk, slipped and fell and hit her head. Another story claims she was in a car accident.) But she has claimed, and OJ has even admitted to mentally and physically abusing her in their 13 year relationship, although he denies giving her her brain injury. So considering his history of violence against women, it's not that hard to believe at all that he murdered Nicole.

Jason might have this explosive anger issue you claim he has, but I've not heard that he has any history of violence against women.

OJ might have been aquitted in criminal court, but he was convicted in civil court. If Jason really did it, why would he have let his dad be convicted in civil court?

__________________
Mwat935139


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink  

Navywife, 

Thanks for your response.   In 1992, Jason Simpson was in an altercation with his girlfriend where he assaulted her by cutting her hair off with a knife.  This is documented.  So the history of rage is there and against a woman.  He also assaulted his co worker with what, "A Knife."  He pled no contest to that charge and was given probation.  When he left work the night of the killings, it's documented that he left with his what, "His knives."  This is all public information, I would never embelish  nor mention a single bit of evidence that wasn't obtained by legal documents or public records.

I understand my position on this case is not  a popular one, but it certainly makes more sence to me than the one presented by the Los Angeles Police Dept.
jealousy as a motive? I'm not buying it.  She wouldn't take him back?  Not buying it.

OJ Simpson had been in a long term relationship with Paula Barbieri during that tme period.  He had moved on and Nicole had moved on  as well.   It's also a known fact that as stated before, Marcus Allen a friend of OJ's had been having a fling with Nicole.  OJ didn't go crazy when he learned of this.  It just doesn't make any sence that on that evening he decides to murder her especially knowing he'd be the first person the police would suspect as the perpetrator.   

Was OJ at the crime scene that night?  Definately, but I suggest to you he was there only after the murder of Nicole and Ron by Jason.  I would love to access  Jason's cell phone records and see if a call was placed to OJ at or about 9:50 pm prompting OJ to go there and see for himself if his son had actually done this or just simply imagined he'd done it.  I believe a struggle between father and son took place that night which is OJ received the cut on his finger.  

I respect your views on this case and regard them as a valued opinion.

Mwat935139

__________________
mrw
annarocket


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2246
Date:
Permalink  

Mwat,There have been more than one of Nicole's former friends and her sister Denise who say Nicole told them all,"Someday he's going to kill me and ger away with it." Paula Barberi was trying to break it off with OJ.Their relationship was pretty much over.And they had most definately NOT moved on.They fought,she instigated situations and on one incident,she showed a large manilla envelope of photos of her battered,black and blue body to a friend, an LAPD officer. OJ was jealous and violent man.He beat his first wife and repeated the pattern with Nicole. He stalked her and to be fair,I think Nicole was confused in the moving on process. She herself was the one that told OJ about being with Markus Allen,something I'd consider ill advised.

Why do you think Jason was never charged if there is this mountain of evidence? Because of OJ's pocket book? I hear that's dwindled a bit.

Navywife,the only simpsons that got any money from the re-titled book,"I Did it:Confessions of the killer" after it was published by the Goldman Family,were the minor children of Nicole and OJ.I might be wrong about that,but mine was invaluable dealing with the 100's of psychos that email me about OJ.

Since I have a chance to say this, I'm going to be it more editorial than anything else.

Nicole Brown Charitable Foundation http://www.nbcf.org

The Ron Goldman Foundation for Justice http://RonGoldmanFoundation.org









__________________

....come death, and welcome! Juliet wills it so!
Navywife


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 580
Date:
Permalink  

Mwat,
Jealousy and rage are some of the leading causes of murders. Murders commited with this mentality are called "crimes of passion."

If OJ had "moved on" as you say, then why did he continutally stalk Nicole right up until her death? If he was over her as you say, he wouldn't have stalked her.

You're certainly welcome to your opinion, but, out of all the theories I've heard concerning this murder, this seems to be the least likely scneario, so far.

Another fact that proves he did it: he ran. We all saw him on tv in that unforgettable police chase. If he was innocent, why would he run? Why would he threaten to kill himself? Only guilty people run from police and threaten to kill themselves.

That same scenario happened where I live. Many years ago, a little girl here was kidnapped on her way home from school (her body has never been found.) One of the leading suspects in the case tried to run when police wanted to question him, and he took them on a long, high speed chase. He finally ended the chase, but held them at bay for a while because he put a gun to his head while still in his vehicle. He wound up committing suicide. Tragically, as far as the police have been able to tell, he never told anyone what he had done with the little girl, if he had killed her, sold her, or what, before he killed himself. He was the only link police had to the child. So her fate may never be known.



__________________
annarocket


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2246
Date:
Permalink  

This is a great point.

WHY did he go on that stupid slow speed chase? I remember every last detail of that,from Robert Kardashian reading that ridiculous note to the fact my pizza was delivered 20 minutes late and the delivery guy saying sorry,he was watching The OJ Show.

If he was really going to kill himself,he wouldn't have tried to have AC Cowlings drive him to Nicole's grave and risk being caught.He would have shot himself at his Rockingham estate where  he and Nicole had spent their most loving years.

It was one giant PR stunt.     evileye

__________________

....come death, and welcome! Juliet wills it so!
Mwat935139


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink  

How is one to react when 15 police cars have you in their sights? Game was up.. He knew at that point that the world in which he once knew was crashing around him.
I respect all of your views, but I think in the end the truth of this case will be made known.

OJ knew at that point that he'd have to face the legal system with the odds against him. Especially after all the evidence mounted by LAPD was made known to the public and that he'd already been tried and convicted in the press. What would you have done? Had a shootout with them?

This will be my last post on this subject as I have no further data to support my therory of the events of June 12, 1994.

I only ask that you keep an open mind, examine the evidence against Jason and hope in the not so distant future that the truth of this case will be revealed.

I respect all of your responses, but suggest to you not to always believe what is priinted in the press. Look for and examine court documents and legal records.

mwat935139

__________________
mrw
Navywife


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 580
Date:
Permalink  

I have gotten most of my info from other sourches, not the media. And it's hard to examine the evidence against Jason when there is none, just speculation.

I do agree with you though that there is much more truth to this than has come out. I don't believe the truth to come out is that Jason is the killer, I'm confident he's not. But I believe others were definitely involved, although, just like the JFK assisnation, we may never know the complete, real truth.

__________________
annarocket


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2246
Date:
Permalink  

Mwat,I'm disapointed you are leaving.The person who can be articulate and factual as well is rare.We hope you'll be back.

I can't imagine 15 police cars chasing me anywhere.He was in that position for reasons truely known only to him. As far as him killing himself,I don't see that.People were standing on the side of the roads with signs saying,"Go Juice!" He was probably loving that.

The media is the last source I trust. But all three of us agree,I think,there is more to this than the public knows.    evileye

__________________

....come death, and welcome! Juliet wills it so!
Mwat935139


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink  

I'll be back Anna, this is a wonderful forum with very interesting dialouge.  I commend you Anna as an administrator, and look forward to being an active member on this site.

Best wishes to all,

mwat935139

__________________
mrw
annarocket


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2246
Date:
Permalink  

Thank you! We'll be looking for you!     evileye



__________________

....come death, and welcome! Juliet wills it so!
annarocket


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2246
Date:
Permalink  

Here's the thread with the alternate theory that this gentleman believes OJ's son Jason was the real killer. Read through it! It's very thought provoking and while I disagree with him, I liked hearing what he had to say.    evileye



__________________

....come death, and welcome! Juliet wills it so!
1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Justice Junction's New Board -> Justice Junction's New Board -> OJ Simpson, an alternative theory
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard