This is a long writing process to cover all the points in a case. I plan on making mine around 1200-2000 Points that all must be answered one way and are contrary to how my case went. It starts cooking in the mid 90's so far...
1. PROOF OF CLAIM - Wrong is not wiped out by reconciliation.
2. PROOF OF CLAIM - One is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent.
3. PROOF OF CLAIM - When you doubt, act.
4. PROOF OF CLAIM - It is not a fault to meddle with what does not belong to or does not concern you.
5. PROOF OF CLAIM - Consent does not make the law: the terms of a contract, lawful in its purpose, constitute the law as between the parties.
6. PROOF OF CLAIM Fraudulent advise creates an obligation.
7. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - He who does not deny, admits.
8. PROOF OF CLAIM - One can sue in the name of another.
9. PROOF OF CLAIM - One is punished for his thoughts, opinions, and writings.
10. PROOF OF CLAIM - One can be punished for merely thinking of a crime.
11. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - He who does not forbid a crime while he may, sanctions it.
12. PROOF OF CLAIM - Gross negligence is not held equivalent to intentional wrong.
13. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Misconduct binds its own authors. It is a never-failing axiom that everyone is accountable only for his own offense or wrong.
14. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Every act is to be estimated by the intention of the doer.
1 15. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - An act does not make a man a criminal, unless his intention be criminal.
16. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - An act does not make a person guilty, unless the intention be also guilty. This maxim applies only to criminal cases; in civil matters it is otherwise.
17. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - The intention amounts to nothing unless some effect follows.
18. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Punishment is due if the words of an oath be false.
19. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Punishment ought not to precede a crime.
20. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - If one falsely accuses another of a crime, the punishment due to that crime should be inflicted upon the perjured informer.
21. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - The meaning of words is the spirit of the law.
22. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Words are to be interpreted according to the subject- matter.
23. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - A fiction is a rule of law that assumes something which is or may be false as true.
24. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Where truth is, fiction of law does not exist.
25. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Fiction of law is wrongful if it works loss or injury to any one.
26. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Fraud lies hid in general expressions.
2 27. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - A concealed fault is equal to a deceit.
28. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - It is a fraud to conceal a fraud.
29. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Gross negligence is equivalent to fraud.
30. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - What otherwise is good and just, if it be sought by force and fraud, becomes bad and unjust.
31. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - He who does not prevent what he can, seems to commit the thing.
32. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - He who does not prevent what he can, seems to commit the thing.
33. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - He who does not prevent what he can prevent, is viewed as assenting.
34. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - He who does not forbid what he can forbid, seems to assent.
35. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - He who does not forbid, when he might forbid, commands.
36. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - He who does not repel a wrong when he can, induces it.
37. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Deceit is an artifice, since it pretends one thing and does another.
38. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Suppression of the truth is equivalent to the expression of what is false.
39. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Earlier in time, is stronger in right. First in time, first in right.
3 40. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Jurisdiction is a power introduced for the public good, on account of the necessity of dispensing justice.
41. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Every jurisdiction has its own bounds.
42. PROOF OF CLAIM - The government is not subject to the law, for the law makes government.
43. PROOF OF CLAIM The government and those in government are allowed to violate the Law.
44. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Let justice be done, though the heavens should fall.
45. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - One who commands lawfully must be obeyed.
46. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - It is the duty of a good judge to remove the cause of litigation.
47. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - To a judge who exceeds his office or jurisdiction no obedience is due.
48. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - One who exercises jurisdiction out of his territory is not obeyed with impunity.
49. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - A good judge decides according to justice and right, and prefers equity to strict law.
50. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Whenever there is a doubt between liberty and slavery, the decision must be in favor of liberty.
51. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - The judge is condemned when a guilty person escapes punishment.
52. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - The judge is counsel for the prisoner. 4 53. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Everyone is presumed to be innocent until his guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt.
54. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - The law punishes falsehood.
55. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - It is a perpetual law that no human or positive law can be perpetual.
56. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - The laws serve the vigilant, not those who sleep upon their rights.
57. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Legal remedies are for the active and vigilant.
58. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Where there is a right, there is a remedy.
59. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - For every legal right the law provides a remedy.
60. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Ignorance of the Law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all a sworn officer of the law.
61. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - An office ought to be injurious to no one.
62. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - A neglected duty often works as much against the interests as a duty wrongfully performed.
63. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Failure to enforce the law does not change it.
64. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - No one gives who does not have.
65. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - No one can give what he does not own.
5 66. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - What is mine cannot be taken away without my consent.
67. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - A citizen cannot be taken by force from his house to be conducted before a judge or to prison.
68. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - He who uses his legal rights, harms no one.
69. PROOF OF CLAIM - An error resisted is approved.
70. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - He who is silent appears to consent.
71. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Things silent are sometimes considered as expressed.
72. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - To conceal is one thing, to be silent another.
73. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Concealment of the truth is (equivalent to) a statement of what is false.
74. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Suppression of fact, which should be disclosed, is the same in effect as willful misrepresentation.
75. PROOF OF CLAIM - A slave is a person.
76. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - The master is liable for injury done by his servant.
77. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - No man is bound to produce writings against himself.
78. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - No one can be made to testify against himself or betray himself.
6 79. PROOF OF CLAIM - One is bound to accuse himself.
80. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - A presumption will stand good until the contrary is proved.
81. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - The presumption is always in favor of the one who denies.
82. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - All things are presumed to be lawfully done and duly performed until the contrary is proved.
83. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - An act done by me against my will is not my act.
84. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - It has been repeatedly held that mere omission from a criminal enactment of any mention of criminal intent should not be read as dispensing with it. Morissette v. United States, 342 U. S. 246, 250 (1952).
85. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - The general rule is that a guilty mind is a necessary element in the indictment and proof of every crime. United States v. Balint, 258 U. S. 250, 251 (1922).
86. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - A defendant generally must know the facts that make his conduct fit the definition of the offense, Staples v. United States, 511 U. S. 600, 608, n. 3 (1994), even if he does not know that those facts give rise to a crime.
87. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - The presumption in favor of a scienter requirement should apply to each of the statutory elements that criminalize otherwise innocent conduct. X-Citement Video, 513 U. S., at 72.
88. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - Federal criminal liability generally does not turn solely on the results of an act without considering the defendants mental state. Under Section 875(c), wrongdoing must be conscious to be criminal. Morissette, 342 U. S., at 252.
7 89. PROOF OF CLAIM The word person when used in legal terminology is not perceived as a general word which normally includes in it's scope a variety of entities other than human beings.
90. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the undersigned as a private party, is a party to the State or Federal Constitution by oath, pledge, contract, or as a signatory.
91. PROOF OF CLAIM - Of any contract (implied or otherwise) that binds the undersigned to the jurisdiction of OKLAHOMA, WASHINGTON, or the UNITED STATES.
92. PROOF OF CLAIM - That FULL DISCLOSURE of all material facts relevant to the entire contract(s) of OKLAHOMA, WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES Constitution(s) as to nexus and application upon the undersigned along with disclosure of the contract defining the construction, purpose, etc., as well as documentation where the agent(s) are defined and empowered to act within the Constitution(s)/contract upon the undersigned.
93. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the Constitution of the United States and the State(s) of OKLAHOMA or WASHINGTON operate upon the Undersigned.
94. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the Undersigned is a PARTY TO Named Therein and/or is a signatory to the SOCIAL COMPACTS known as the UNITED STATES and State(s) of OKLAHOMA/WASHINGTON Constitution(s).
No private person has the right to complain by suit in court, on the grounds of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it PADDLEFORD FAY & CO. V. MAYOR AND ALDERMAN, CITY OF SAVVANNAH, 14th GA, 438, 520, 211 U.S. 78 (1854).
95. PROOF OF CLAIM That the Undersigned is NAMED THEREIN any Statute(s). Law(s), Code(s) and the like. (See: THE PEOPLE V. HERKIMER GENTLEMEN, ONE, AND COMPANY, 4 COWEN 345, 1825 N.Y. LEXIS 80).
8 96. PROOF OF CLAIM Of the LIABILITY of the Undersigned to the Statutes, Laws, Codes, and the like of the Corporate Government of the United States and the State(s) of WASHINGTON or OKLAHOMA.
97. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the Undersigned is a PARTY TO: Named Therein and/or is a Signatory to any Valid/Lawful Contract and/or Agreement, duly Notarized along with a copy of the Notary Log to the Federal Corporate Government and/or any of the Sub-Agencies/Corporations, i.e. the State(s) of Oklahoma and Washington, or your Agency.
98. PROOF OF CLAIM That a Corporation such as the United States and the State(s) of Oklahoma or Washington, can attain parity with a sentient, living, breathing, flesh-and-blood man such as the Undersigned.
... there every man is independent of all laws except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellow man without his consent. CRUDEN V. NEAL, 2 N.C. 338, 2 S.E. 70 (1796).
99. PROOF OF CLAIM That concealment or non disclosure of all terms, liabilities, and obligations of a Contract make Legal, Binding, and Valid Contracts.
100. PROOF OF CLAIM That the Undersigned is a resident (Belonging To or Chattel Property Of) the State(s) of Oklahoma or Washington Corporations, and/or United States Corporation, or any subdivision /instrumentality thereof, i.e. does the Undersigned reside within a faction, a construct of law, an abstraction.
101. PROOF OF CLAIM That there is a clause within the Constitution of the Corporate State(s) of Oklahoma or Washington, and/or the Corporate United States, that subject a Private Man (Sovereign and Retaining His/Her Jurisdiction and Venue Within Themselves) to the Statutory Jurisdiction(s) thereof.
9 102. PROOF OF CLAIM That all Crimes/Court Actions are not Commercial as stated in part, within section 72.11 of Title 27 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
103. PROOF OF CLAIM That United States District Judge Robin J. Cauthron, United States Attorney Sandford Coats, and Assistant United States Attorney Chris Stephens acting on behalf of United States 10th District Court of Western Oklahoma, the Corporate State(s) of Oklahoma and Washington and the United States Federal Corporation, did not know that what they were doing under CAN, was Beyond the Scope of their Corporate Charter, and that they did not have Authority to violate the Good Faith, Commercial Law, and Securities Law, in binding the Undersigned to an Undischargeable Contract to incapacitate him of his rights.
A contract made by a corporation beyond the scope of it's corporate power is Unlawful and VOID. MCCORMICK V. MARKET NATIONAL BANK, 165 U.S. 538.
104. PROOF OF CLAIM That within CAN that the Judgement was not COMMERCIAL PAPER and was not deposited into a bank or converted into an item of Deposit for the commercial benefit to United States District Judge Robin J. Cauthron, United States Attorney Sandford Coats, and Assistant United States Attorney Chris Stephens, United States 10th District Court of Western Oklahoma, State(s) of Oklahoma and/or Washington, Oklahoma County and/or Grady County of Oklahoma, the United States, and/or the World Bank.
105. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the Organic/De Jure Constitution(s) for Washington or Oklahoma Republic, and the Organic/De Jure Constitution for the united States of America, and the State(s) of Oklahoma and Washington. And the United States are operating under the same.
10 106. PROOF OF CLAIM That when a Social Security Account Number is assigned/issued, that a Blank Bond is not issued and when the Undersigned was arrested and there after imprisoned, that this Bond was not filled out and that this Bond is not called a BID BOND or BLAKELY BID BOND, Standard Form 24 (SF24) and that it is not prescribed by the General Service Administration (GSA), and that this is not also referred to as a PRISON or PENAL BOND, as well as a CONTRACT SURETY BOND and that a follow-up PERFORMANCE BOND Standard Form 25(SF25) and PAYMENT BOND Standard Form 25A(SF25A) were not filled out.
107. PROOF OF CLAIM - When no one else is investigated, arrested, charged, or imprisoned an individual can be charged with AID AND ABETTING 18 U.S. Code § 2 alone.
108. PROOF OF CLAIM When Duress, Coercion, Superior Bargaining Power, and Force is employed by Government Officers and Agents to obtain a confession of guilt and a plea of GUILTY before the Court, Due Process has been served.
109. PROOF OF CLAIM - When Court Officers breach their Fiduciary Duties and breach their Duty to the Public they are not subject to Legal Action and are immune from Suit at Law.
110. PROOF OF CLAIM That the Accused has equal bargaining power in Court against a Government of Superior Numbers and Unlimited Resources.
111. PROOF OF CLAIM That the Judgment of Sentence rendered by the Judge under CAN, is not VOID from the inception and as to why the Undersigned should not be released of all implications thereof immediately, due to all of the Fraud underlying such Judgment, and although the Undersigned could go about discharging the Fraudulent Monetary Debt, underlying the Judgment, i.e. going through all of the formalities which are really unnecessary When The Facts Of Fraud Make the Judgment VOID.
113. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the secured party/Undersigned has access to 'lawful money of account' to 'pay' debts at law without becoming a tort feasor.
114. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the secured party has access to 'lawful money of account' to 'pay' debts at law without becoming a tort feasor.
115. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the State(s) of Oklahoma/Washington/STATE(S) OF OKLAHOMA/WASHINGTON did not adopt in some capacity the Uniform Commercial Code and that all transactions included but not limited to courts are governed under the UCC and/or the Negotiable Instrument Law as designed, to cover commercial paper, [which] IS currency. La. Stat. Ann. - R.S. 71 et seq. LSA-C.C, Art. 2139.
116. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the undersigned cannot accept for value any public or private presentment/invoice/Bill, etc., for fine, fee, tax, debt or judgment and discharge the same with a Bill of exchange or other commercial paper as necessary to carry on commerce.
117. PROOF OF CLAIM - That there are clauses in the state/STATE or Federal Constitution(s) that subject a citizen to statutory jurisdiction.
118. PROOF OF CLAIM - That "the ultimate ownership of all property is not in the State; being that individual so-called ownership is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessity of the State." (See: Hearing Before A Subcommittee of the Committee on Foreign Relations, February 17, 1950, pg. 494, Exhibit H-4, Constitution For The United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Treaty Document 97-19 and the Communist Manifesto)
12 119. PROOF OF CLAIM That Rights enumerated in the BILL OF RIGHTS (Amendments to the Constitution for the united States of the America, I X) are not property of the individual and have no bearing today.
120. PROOF OF CLAIM of the contrary - That "All that governments does and provides legitimately is in pursuit of its duty to provide protection for private rights, which duty is a debt owed to it creator, WE THE PEOPLE, (Wynhammer v. People, NY 378)... and the private enfranchised individual; which debt and duty is never extinguished nor discharged, and is perpetual. No matter what the government/state provides for us in manner of convenience and safety, the enfranchised individual owes nothing to the government." See: Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43)
121. PROOF OF CLAIM - That ALL officers and employees of the State(s) of Oklahoma/Washington/STATE(S) OF OKLAHOMA/WASHINGTON including Judges are under a Constitutional Oath of Office to support and defend both U.S. and State Constitutions.
122. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the officers and employees of the State(s) of Oklahoma/Washington/STATE(S) OF OKLAHOMA/WASHINGTON including Judges are not bound to support Amendment in Article I, § X, (No State shall... make any Thing but gold and silver coin a Tender in Payment of Debts).
123. PROOF OF CLAIM - That there exists within the State/STATE a State Executive Agency that regulates the general Public.
124. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the undersigned is a 'refugee' under international law and is captured property of the State.
125. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the undersigned is 'liable' quasi-ex contractu for any benefits forced and compelled upon him/her.
126. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the People have no Right to Free Travel within the States upon the public roads.
13 127. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the Right to Free Speech was not re enforced by ELONIS V. UNITED STATES, 13-983 U.S. ___ (2015).
128. PROOF OF CLAIM That a subjective intent to threaten is not required as a matter of statutory interpretation.
129. PROOF OF CLAIM That it is a requirement of the First Amendment that the People must self censor and subordinate their writings and thoughts before the Government lest they be imprisoned for THOUGHT CRIMES.
130. PROOF OF CLAIM That the Government can be a Plaintiff in any case it has no direct interest in; when it itself has sustained no damage to itself or it's property.
131. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the United States Attorney's Office and United States Judges are not paid by the same department, Department of Justice, and both can be expected to be impartial in matters concerning the Accused.
132. PROOF OF CLAIM - That United States Judges and United States Attorneys have no interest what so ever (including financial) in finding the Accused guilty.
133. PROOF OF CLAIM That it is legal to withhold medical care or provide substandard medical care to the point of malpractice and neglect to any United States Prisoner in custody with injures, ailments, infections, diseases, or disabilities in the United States Bureau of Prisons, county holding facilities, and contract half way houses.
134. PROOF OF CLAIM That it is legal to withhold toilet facilities for over 17 (Seventeen) Hours during transport of prisoners within the United States Bureau of Prisons.
135. PROOF OF CLAIM That it is legal to withhold sunlight from Prisoners in the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons or county holding facilities for months at a time.
14 136. PROOF OF CLAIM That it is legal to withhold legal materials to Prisoners in the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons while in county holding facilities and half way houses to aid them with their cases or for wrong doing by those facilities.
137. PROOF OF CLAIM That it is legal to house lower level white collar non violent Prisoners in custody with high level violent Prisoners in custody together in county holding facilities and half way houses by the United States Bureau of Prisons and poses no safety risk to those in custody.
138. PROOF OF CLAIM - That there can be no expectation of privacy in one's communications, writings, papers, opinions, or thoughts at any time.
139. PROOF OF CLAIM One does not have the Right to face one's accuser.
140. PROOF OF CLAIM The United States Attorney's Office and it's Officer's are entitled to directly represent the UNITED STATES and provide evidence or witness on it's behalf in a Court of Law.
141. PROOF OF CLAIM - Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Attorney's Officers are allowed to commit perjury before the Court.
142. PROOF OF CLAIM - Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Attorney's Officers are allowed to conceal evidence before the Court.
143. PROOF OF CLAIM - US District Courts do not buy all the state court judgments.
144. PROOF OF CLAIM - CUSIP is not an identification system.
145. PROOF OF CLAIM The United States Bureau of Prisons allows torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment of Prisoners in their custody.
15 146. PROOF OF CLAIM The United States Bureau of Prisons and United States Office of Probations allows Prisoners in their custody to be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention, or exile.
147. PROOF OF CLAIM The United States does not afford it's citizens or the Citizens of the Individual States the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
148. PROOF OF CLAIM - The United States does not afford it's citizens or the Citizens of the Individual States the right of freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
119
127
-- Edited by exexpat93 on Thursday 4th of June 2015 05:00:50 AM
132
-- Edited by exexpat93 on Thursday 4th of June 2015 05:01:11 AM
149. PROOF OF CLAIM That Freedom of Information Offices/Officers within the Executive Branch are allowed to withhold public records at will and not dispense records when requested.
150. PROOF OF CLAIM That Freedom of Information Offices/Officers within the Executive Branch are allowed to hide files and records in I, S, External, and 'Blackball' files from the public when they are requested.
151. PROOF OF CLAIM Proof of Jurisdiction can not be questioned at any time; before, during, or after a case has been tried.
152. PROOF OF CLAIM Government Officials, Court Officers and Agents are allowed to deny the accused counsel when they are questioned.
153. PROOF OF CLAIM Government Officials, Court Officers, and Agents are allowed to threaten the Accused with imprisonment during questioning if the Accused does not answer questions as they wish them answered or provide confessions.
154. PROOF OF CLAIM - The Accused Lawyer's first and only duty is to his Client and not the Court as an Officer of the Court.
16
155. PROOF OF CLAIM - The United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Marshals Service is allowed to withhold food and drink from prisoners for over 20 hours at a time during transport as a matter of course.
156. PROOF OF CLAIM - That in my private capacity, while not conducting any type of business, that I am subject to Class A, B, or a Commercial Driver License.
157. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the Motor Vehicle Code does not operate upon all 'drivers' of 'all' vehicles owned or operated by 'the United States', the 'State(s) of Oklahoma or Washington', 'any county within a state/State', 'city', 'district', 'or any political subdivision of Oklahoma or Washington' and thus operates on the private man.
158. PROOF OF CLAIM - That my 'private vehicle' is used for the transportation of persons for compensation or profit, or designed or used primarily for the transportation of property (Not For Hire).
159. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney, United States District Judge, Federal Bureau of Investigation Agents, Probation Officers, and all who had a hand in my Court Case including Government Employees in the State(s) of Oklahoma and Washington has an established liability bond either personally or by and through any Risk Management Policy in this action to indemnify the private man in the event of any damnification, and I request the Policy Number and the addresses of the Insurer/Bonding Company.
160. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the State(s) of Oklahoma and Washington /STATE(S) OF OKLAHOMA and WASHINGTON does not operated under the U.S. Bankruptcy confirmed on June 5, 1933 (see Senate Report No. 93-549, codified at 12 U.S.C.A. 95 a) also known as the National Emergency. (See Executive Proclamation No. 3872).
7
161. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the U.S. Bankruptcy did not impair the obligations and considerations through the Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard And Abrogate the Gold Clause, - June 5, 1933 as it may operate within the State(s) of Oklahoma and Washington/ STATE(S) OF OKLAHOMA and WASHINGTON.
162. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the State(s) of Oklahoma and Washington /STATE(S) OF OKLAHOMA and WASHINGTON were not one of the several States of the Union that pledged the faith and credit (of the people) thereof to the aid of the National Government in respect to the National Emergency in and around 1934.
163. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the U.S. Bankruptcy/National Emergency has been terminated and does not operate within The, This, or These State(s) of Oklahoma and Washington/STATE(S) OF OKLAHOMA and WASHINGTON and lawful 'Constitutional' money has been reinstated and is in circulation to allow the people to 'pay their debts at law'.
164. PROOF OF CLAIM - That within the State(s) of Oklahoma and Washington/STATE(S) OF OKLAHOMA and WASHINGTON all State Banks are not under the direction and control of the corporate Governor of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) (See: Public Law 94-564).
165. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the State(s) of Oklahoma and Washington /STATE(S) OF OKLAHOMA and WASHINGTON by becoming a corporator (see: 22 U.S.C.A. 286e) did not lay down it's sovereignty and take on [the character] that of a private citizen and that it can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter. (See: The Bank of United States vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244).
166. PROOF OF CLAIM - That the people have not succeeded to the rights of the King, the former sovereign of this State, and are not, therefore, bound by general words in a statute without being expressly named. (See: THE PEOPLE v. HERKEIMER, Gentleman, One, & Company, Cowen 345; 1825 N.Y. LEXIS 80).
18
167. PROOF OF CLAIM - Laws, Codes, Statutes, Regulations, Rule, By-Laws, or any Act passed by the State(s) of Oklahoma or Washington/STATE(S) OF OKLAHOMA or WASHINGTON, the United States Federal Government, UNITED STATES, Counties, Cities and other artificial/fictional geographic boundaries created by government that opposes or is repugnant to the Constitution for the united States of America is De Jure and are legal and binding.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury v. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803).
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them." U.S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona 380 U.S. 436 (1966).
"Constitutional rights may not be infringed simply because the majority of the people choose that they be." U.S. Supreme Court in Westbrook v. Mihaly 2 C3d 75.
Any attempt to pass or enforce an unconstitutional law -- especially any law that violates the first ten amendments to the Constitution, commonly known as the Bill of Rights -- is a crime punishable by ten years in prison and a ten thousand dollar fine for each offense." Title 18 U.S.C, Sections 241 and 242.
168. PROOF OF CLAIM - That Supreme Court Decisions, both prior to 1938 and those after, are not valid unless they have been superseded by a newer decision.
-- Edited by exexpat93 on Saturday 6th of June 2015 08:51:16 PM
