Thanks Anna for your kind words. I am heartbroken that somone could do that to me but i was a fool for not getting back-up. Louie kept telling me he would do that for me. I should have known better and am now kicking myself in the rear for not doing it here. Love your site. The best to you.. At least some people got to read it. Love, Heather. former editor of freelisalambert.com Lancaster has a 3 paper monopoly and nobody seems to want to think that their officials would lie or destroy evidence. Some have tried to go up against them but I'm afraid it's a losing battle. They, Lancaster Newspapers Inc. are a very powerful corporation. Lisa used to tell me the whole place was like that movie The Stepford Wives. Everybody happy and without a care in the world for what really goes on there.

Isn't this the chick that was pregnant when she killed Laurie Show? Then somehow she was released after being found guilty then put back in prison? I have a book and a video of this case but they are packed away somewhere.Guess I'll have to see if I have the inclination to dig them out.

I remember that very well and I too know how much work goes into making a website, as I made one for Gerri and the girls.  Much Much work goes into that.  I am very sorry Heather that some scum bag did that to you, but don't give up and just keep pushing and you will get another site up I'm sure.
                                                                             

ALL RIGHT....GAME OVER.

So,I went away for a few days,nice time,got some rest.Real peaceful.
When I get back,I have about 300 e-mails regarding the case of Lisa Lambert and Laurie Show.

To put it nicely,some of them were less than complementary.Very colorful language included.

Heather,I know this was not your doing and I'm not holding you responsible.None of the e-mails mention you AT ALL,I don't want you to feel bad.But this all happened after your website got jacked and this is the only way I have to try to get in touch with you.

IN ADDITION,this is the way I'm telling all 300 of you at once,we aren't going to go back and re-try the Lambert case here.That is done.Not only is Lisa in prison,most people here believe she belongs there and if you bring the noise here,it will be more pain than gain.

You dig?     

Heather,please PM me your email address so I can discuss this with you and you can let me know if you want to hear from Lisa's supporters.    

I am going to start a site saveheatherjohnston.com and take donations to buy you a permanent bed at the funny farm.

Well Anna, it's funny what a google search of your name will find!!!! After I read Heather's post I was taken back to say the least. How could I have possibly stole her site? Why would I have stole her site? She was the owner of the site and had full access to the ftp site, all she had to do was copy it down. She did not pay her fees, did not back it up and the webhosting company took it down.

After Lisa lost her last appeal, I spoke to Heather on the phone. She said , and I quote " forget about her now, she's never getting out" and started talking about some other case. I forgot what case it was, I think it involved children............but anyway, I figured she was moving on. I was getting married and moved on myself.

How she can come back 6 years later and accuse me of stealing something after all the help I gave her is crazy.

Thanks for letting me vent, I trust I won't hear from Heather as she will probably be embarrassed............but who knows....she loved stirring up trouble.

Hi Anna! Haven't been here for awhile and just saw Louie's response. I have already e-mailed him several times thanking him for what he did for me and the site. It's my original site, that I never got back from him. The one my husband started that had all the e-mails which Louie edited. Louie is right, I didn't get back up, because I trusted that he would post everything from my original site onto the new one that he built. When he finally sent the disc to me, it was just what he had programmed onto it, leaving out my original writings which included years of research while I lived in Lancaster. My original website was started in 1997, and was not just about Lisa Lambert. I had so much response from people there who had also suffered injustice, that my husband and I put up our fax number for readers to send us documents. It was a virtual deluge. I began writing stories based on those documents. I made phone calls, did research, and then traveled to Lancaster and sat in on Lisa's PCRA hearing. I went to Tina Rainville's office in Phildelphia and spent 3 days reading all the transcripts. Her original trial was so shocking, brief, and corrupted, it took my breath away.After Tina and her husband read it, they agreed to take her case, pro bono. To call it a charade, is an understatement. When Federal Judge Stewart Dalzell gave her new attorneys wide discovery, they went to Lancaster and got access to all the information that was never introduced in her trial. Butch Yunkin's bloody sneakers, which were found during a video search at the river, then edited out. His Bloody sweatpants,full of Laurie Show's blood, which were subsequently destroyed before the Habeus Hearing and replaced with a brand new pair, Lisa's size. They had claimed (Kenneff, the prosecutor) that Lisa had been wearing them in her original trial. Judge Stengel assumed that Lisa had been wearing them, even though they were extra extra large. Once Tina Rainville got all the documents, it became apparent, that even in Butch's statement, he said she wasn't wearing them. You see, Anna, Lancaster hadn't counted on being examined thoroughly about the Lambert case. They thought it was a done deal.They didn't bother to destroy statements from witnesses which clearly proved Yunkin to be the murderer of Laurie Show. They didn't bother to destroy documents which showed that they paid the pathologist 16,000 more the following year after he testified that Laurie could have spoken. A deal that was made after he previously said that it wasn't possible. All of this is in those transcripts, which I still own, and paid a lot for. Laurie Show never said, "Michelle did it", she was dead when Hazel got to the condo.Even that is in the transcripts. Testimony by the paramedics. Hazel never told anybody that day or even the next week, that her daughter had named Michelle the killer. In fact, because they had no evidence linking Lisa to the crime, but plenty to convict Yunkin, Detective Savage came to her house and convinced her to say her daughter had made a dying declaration. On my original site, which Louie has, I wrote a whole story about that. Hazel testified that when she found Laurie, her throat had been cut so deeply that she had to "cradle her in her arms and put everything back together", as horrifying as that must have been, it would have been impossible for Laurie to have said anything. All of the arteries had been cut. The carotid, those responsible for speech, the hyoid , all of this is in those transcripts. None of it was in Lisa's original trial. The original trial was 6 days long. They wanted to give her the death penalty.Rainville got the unedited video, showing the finding of Yunkin's sneakers, she got the reports by investigators that Lisa was wearing stretchpants, size small. None of this was entered into evidence at her original trial.Kenneff just lied and said that Lisa was wearing Butch's sweatpants. That didn't work at the Habeus Hearing, because Tina had gotten the original report about what Lisa was wearing. The one witheld from her original trial, but still in the files. Butch's bloody sweatpants disappeared before Judge Dalzell began to hear testimony, because investigators knew that Rainville had all the correct information now. They actually introduced a new pair, now Lisa's size and tried to say they were the same ones. Kenneff admitted those would have looked ridiculous on Yunkin, who was 6 ft. tall and 200 or more pounds. The earring back they found in Laurie's hair during the hair, Yunkin admitted to wearing the pearl earring that day, on tape, which Tina obtained. The back of it disappeared from the evidence room before the Habeus Hearing. I know, Anna, that you don't want to retry this case, here, but I want you to know, that the truth about Laurie Show's murder is in those transcripts. As for Louie, he can call me anything he wants. All I wanted was my original website, which I sent him years ago, when he first contacted me about making my site great. What made my site great, were the articles I had written years ago, which he never included in the new site, although I kept asking him when they would be put up. It told a story that goes far beyond Lisa Lambert.
Thanks, Anna, hope to hear from you. And Yes, I would love to hear from Lisa supporters, and those who called me noble and brave. You know what, many people told me that. Especially when I lived there and told their stories. The campaign against Lisa has been well orchestrated, and your mind is probably made up, as you indicate. You don't know the whole story.I never gave up on Lisa Lambert, as Louie indicates, I just got frustrated because I know for a fact there are so many more out there like her. I didn't say forget about her. I did say, she's probably never getting out.

Hi Anna, just checked in after a long hiatus. So, two people sent you 300 e-mails? Good Lord, I would love to know those IP addresses. For the record, I no longer have the disc that I sent to Louie with my original articles on it. He has it. As for who now owns my website, it is not possible to find that out, because whoever bought it, requested they be anonymous. I tried to find that out myself. I never suggested that Louie bought my domain name. He just never sent me my original disc, which I asked for. He's right that I should have gotten back-up, but why didn't he just send me the disc of my original writings? As for Lisa getting her day in court, that's true, she did. And that's why she was released, because of all the perjured testimony, witness tampering, falsified documents and destroyed evidence. In the transcripts an expert testified that Laurie in her own blood, wrote the initials T and B on the closet door. The photographs of that were never introduced at Lisa's original trial. Tina Rainville got them from the insurance agency, then the expert on blood evidence testified to that. Even Savage testified that the initials were T and B and told that to the medical personnel after Laurie's murder.On my original disc are lots of supportive e-mails from Lancaster, but Louie never posted those, although I kept telling him how important that was. What is truly sad about this case, is that Laurie Show's true killer is out on the streets now, even though she tried to name them both, in her own blood. As for Tabitha, she never testified in any of the trials until Lisa was forced to go back to the same judge that convicted her without any evidence in the first place. At the federal hearing, her own attorney refused to let her testify, claiming that she would perjure herself. She had already named Yunkin the killer in her deposition.She never even testified at her own trial. A trial that was held in Buck's County, not Lancaster, a privilege that Lisa never got. Anna, I was in the courtroom for Lisa's so-called retrial. The lead prosecuter took the 5th ammendment 59 times that day, when asked if he tainted evidence, destroyed evidence, tampered with witnesses, and edited video tape of evidence searches. That was Robert Reed, convicted child molester, who was only convicted right before Lisa's second trial, although he had been molesting his stepdaughter for years. I realize I will never change your mind, but if you would be so kind as to share with me privately, if you will, those people who e-mailed you about my efforts. You can reach me at hjohnston612@gmail.com. The only people who know who killed Laurie, are the ones that did it. This case has been so tainted, it is truly sad. All I have ever tried to do is find out who really killed this poor girl. I believe Judge Dalzell did that. The evidence against both Tabitha and Yunkin is overwhelming. The bloodhounds who found the rope with Tabitha's scent in the middle of the ice, for one thing. The deep scratches that were on her face, taken the day of the murder. Scratches on Yunkin's face, taken the day of the murder. Thank you Anna, for making me welcome here. I know it's not you I'm trying to convince, that doesn't sound possible, but trust me, I know more about this case than most people, and have spent years trying to say just one thing. Courts should not be allowed to convict a person without substantial and untainted evidence. Also, if evidence which proves their innocence is destroyed, or ignored, it's a violation of Brady-Giglio rights and Constitutional rights. Perjured testimony which was found to be rampant in Lisa's case, should be recognized and Dalzell did just that. Even John Bowman, who participated in Lisa's rape said in his deposition that he "had no idea" where he was that night. Then, at her second trial, he claimed he was on his honeymoon. The only cancelled checks he could produce had his wife's name on them, not his. Anyway, thanks for letting me have my say. I hope you are well, and would love to hear from you. Sincerely, Heather Johnston. Are you still wearing your Marilyn Manson t-shirt? What on earth ever happened to him?